[BBF Standards] functional composition of BioBrick parts?

[Bryan Bishop]

On Thursday 31 January 2008, "Julius B. Lucks" wrote:
> It sounds like there needs to be an annotation system in place that  
> would allow compatibility evidence to be labeled as experimentally or
>   computationally generated (or both).  We might even consider the
> possibility of digitally signing the annotations to associate
> experiments or calculations with known labs.  The preliminary
> question would be whether or not the annotations would be a part of
> the main parts ontology, or would it be a separate ontology itself.

I certainly see the need to be able to reference other sub-ontologies 
related to understanding the experimental methods for testing the 
brick, or the specifications for the computational evidence etc.

- Bryan
________________________________________
Bryan Bishop
http://heybryan.org/