96 channel pipette: moving a whole plate at once, and what it commits you to

Specifying plate pipetting

1. Check head reach against your plates. Deep wells, skirted plates and low volume formats each impose a geometry. A head that cannot reach the bottom of a deep well, or that fouls a skirt, is unusable for that format however good it is elsewhere.
2. Cost tips per plate, not per box. A full plate head consumes a rack of tips per transfer. At the intended run rate that recurring cost frequently exceeds the depreciation on the device, and second sourcing may be restricted.
3. Match the device to how full the plates are. Partial plate work is better served by an eight or twelve channel device; a full head used on a half plate wastes tips and time. Most laboratories need both.
4. Use a dispenser where the reagent is common. Filling a plate with one reagent is a dispenser's job, not a pipette's. It is faster, uses a tube rather than tips, and is more consistent.
5. Verify plate devices as a set. A multichannel device has to be verified channel by channel, because one weak channel produces a column of outliers that looks like a biological effect. Software that records per channel results is worth having.

One weak channel, one bad column

Multichannel devices fail channel by channel, and the result is a systematic pattern across a plate that is easy to read as biology. Per channel verification is what catches it, and an average across channels hides it.

Rotating the plate between replicates is a cheap diagnostic: a pattern that rotates with the plate is biology, and one that stays put is the device.

Tips are the running cost

At plate scale the consumable bill dominates. Whether a second source of tips exists, and whether the device tolerates them, is a commercial question that should be settled before purchase.

Ask for a year of tips at your intended run rate as part of the quotation. It changes the comparison between devices more often than the specification does.

An 8 channel pipette below the whole-plate head

An eight or twelve channel instrument transfers a row or a column at a time and is far cheaper, far more flexible and far more forgiving of plate geometry than a whole-plate head. For most laboratories it is the right first purchase, and the plate head only earns its place once the number of plates per week justifies it.

At larger volumes these instruments become heavy and the plunger force rises, so the ergonomic argument for an electronic version is stronger here than on a single-channel instrument. Anyone filling deep-well plates by hand for an afternoon will make that case without being asked.

Adjustable spacing, and what it replaces

An instrument whose channels move apart transfers between formats that do not share a spacing: tubes to a plate, a plate to a gel, one plate density to another. Without it those transfers are done one channel at a time, which is where most of the error and most of the time in a plate workflow lives.

It is a specific and not inexpensive capability, so the question is how often the protocol crosses formats. Where it does so daily the instrument pays for itself quickly; where it does so monthly, a reformatting step and a careful operator are cheaper.

A 384 well pipette, and when the density is the wrong answer

The higher density head is bought to halve the plate count and it changes three things at once: the volumes are smaller and therefore harder to hold accurately, the tips are more expensive per well, and every liquid handling error that was tolerable at the lower density becomes visible. A dispense that wets the tip exterior at two microlitres is a measurable bias at half a microlitre.

So the question is whether the assay tolerates the volume rather than whether the instrument can reach it. Where the reagent is the cost, the density pays for itself quickly; where the readout is at the limit of its sensitivity, the lower density plate and a longer run is the cheaper experiment. Try the assay at the intended volume before buying the head.

A multichannel pipette for 384 well plate work

A 384 well plate is on nine millimetre centres halved to four and a half, so an eight or twelve channel pipette built for 96 wells addresses every other well rather than every well. Three routes exist: a 384 channel head on a bench unit or a deck, a 16 or 24 channel pipette on 4.5 millimetre spacing, or an offset technique where a 96 tip head fills a quadrant at a time and is indexed four times. The last is cheapest and the slowest, and it is where evaporation across a long fill starts to show in the assay.

A 384 well multichannel pipette, and the spacing it needs

A pipette for 384 well plates works on 4.5 millimetre centres, half the 9 millimetre spacing a 96 well head uses, which is why an eight or twelve channel unit from the 96 well world addresses alternate wells. Sixteen and 24 channel pipettes on the tighter pitch exist, and a 384 tip head on a bench unit or a deck covers the whole plate at once. The practical constraint is the tip: a 4.5 millimetre pitch needs tips designed for it, and the volumes are small enough that evaporation across a slow fill shows up in the data.

A 1 ml multichannel pipette, and what the volume costs

A multichannel at the top of the volume range is a heavier instrument with longer tips, and both matter. The tips hold more liquid above the piston, so hanging drops and blowout technique change; the reservoir has to be deep enough for eight channels to reach a millilitre each; and the force to seat eight large tips is enough to make a long plate run uncomfortable. For deep well blocks and media additions it is the right tool. For anything under about two hundred microlitres a smaller channel set is more accurate and much less tiring.

A pipette tips box, and what the packaging is for

Tip packaging is part of the specification. A racked box keeps tips upright and untouched, which is what makes single-handed loading possible and keeps fingers off the shank; a sterile box is certified as packed and is compromised once it has stood open on a bench; a refill stack or a reload tray cuts plastic and cost, at the price of handling the tips during the refill. For amplification work the box's own certification, free of DNase, RNase and human DNA, is worth more than the tip's shape, and it is the thing to read on the label.

Types of pipette tips, and choosing between them

Tips differ in five ways that change results. The fit, which is body-specific and where most volume error comes from. The filter, which protects the barrel and the sample from aerosol and is required for amplification. The bore, standard or wide for viscous and fragile samples. The surface, low-retention for detergents, protein and small volumes. And the certification, sterile and free of nucleases and human DNA where the workflow demands it. Length and shape matter too for deep wells and narrow tubes. Buy the minimum set that covers the protocols rather than one universal tip.

Common questions

Is a full plate head worth it?

When whole plates are transferred repeatedly, yes, because it removes ninety six chances to make an error. For partial plates and varied work it is expensive and inflexible.

Why does one column of my plate read differently?

Frequently a single weak channel on a multichannel device. Verify per channel rather than as an average, and rotate the plate once as a diagnostic.

Dispenser or pipette for filling a plate?

A dispenser, whenever the same reagent goes into every well. It is faster, more consistent and does not consume tips.

Eight channels or a whole plate head?

A row device first, in almost every case: it is cheaper, more flexible and tolerant of plate geometry. A whole-plate head earns its place on throughput, once the plates per week justify the tip cost and the reach constraints.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices