Commissioning material testing: how a mechanical testing laboratory, a material testing lab, a tensile testing lab, a tensile test lab or a tensile testing metallurgical laboratory specifies a tensile tester against a named standard, when a metallurgical testing lab or metallurgical testing laboratory answers a question mechanical testing cannot, and how failure analysis testing, metallurgical failure analysis and a failure analysis lab or failure analysis laboratory keep a conclusion defensible

Specifying the work

1. Name the standard, the specimen and the condition. A tensile result is meaningless without the standard, the specimen geometry, the orientation relative to the material's processing direction, the strain rate and the temperature. A quotation for a tensile test without those is a quotation for a number, not a measurement.
2. Check the accreditation scope covers the actual test. Accreditation is granted for specific tests on specific materials over specific ranges. A laboratory accredited for tensile testing of steel is not thereby accredited for a polymer, and the scope document says which is which.
3. Use metallurgical testing when the question is why, not how much. Mechanical testing tells you what a material does. Sectioning, mounting, etching and examining the microstructure tells you why: grain size, phase distribution, heat treatment condition, inclusions and weld quality. A hardness traverse across a weld answers questions no tensile bar can.
4. Preserve the evidence before any failure analysis begins. Photograph the assembly in place, do not clean the fracture surface, do not fit the pieces back together, and keep any fluids or debris. The fracture surface carries the history of the failure and wiping it removes the answer. This is the single most damaging thing done to failed parts.
5. Sequence the analysis from non-destructive to destructive. Visual and photographic, then fracture surface examination, then chemistry, then sectioning and microstructure, then mechanical tests on the remaining material. Once the part is cut, the earlier observations cannot be repeated.

Reading a test report properly

The report should carry the standard, the specimen details, the equipment and its calibration status, the environmental conditions, the raw curves where relevant and the measurement uncertainty. A single number with a pass or fail is not reviewable.

Ask for the load-extension curves rather than just the derived properties. Anomalies such as slippage in the grips or a specimen failing at the shoulder are visible in the curve and invisible in the summary.

Sampling, which decides what the result represents

A result represents the specimen tested and, by inference, whatever the specimen was sampled to represent. Where the material is heterogeneous, orientation and location matter enormously and should be recorded on a sketch.

Take enough replicates to say something about variation. Three specimens give a mean and almost nothing about scatter, and scatter is frequently the property that actually matters.

Failure analysis as an investigation, not a test

The best failure analyses combine the physical evidence with the service history: loads, environment, maintenance and any change shortly before failure. A laboratory given a part and no context can describe the fracture and rarely explain it.

Agree the report's scope in advance, including whether a root cause opinion is expected and whether it may be used in a dispute. A report written as a technical description reads very differently from one written knowing it may be challenged.

Common questions

What do I need to give a laboratory to order material testing?

The test standard, the material and its condition, the specimen geometry and orientation, the number of replicates, the acceptance criteria if any, and the environment the test should run in. Without these the result cannot be compared with anything.

What does metallurgical testing add?

Microstructure, which explains behaviour. Grain size, phase distribution, heat treatment condition, inclusions and weld integrity are what tell you why a material performed as it did rather than simply how it performed.

What should I do with a failed part before sending it for failure analysis?

As little as possible. Photograph it in place, do not clean or wipe the fracture surface, do not mate the fracture faces together, preserve any fluids or debris, and record who handled it. Cleaning destroys the evidence the analysis depends on.

Does a tensile tester give the same result everywhere?

Only under the same standard, geometry, rate and grip arrangement. Differences between laboratories nearly always come from specimen preparation and gripping rather than from the machine, which is why the standard has to be named in the order.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices