Thermal cyclers and thermocyclers: choosing a thermocycler block format, ramp rate and gradient, and what to check on thermal cyclers before you buy

The decisions that last

1. Block format commits you to consumables. Whether the block takes individual tubes, strips, a plate of a given format, or is interchangeable, determines your plastic for years. Interchangeable blocks cost more and are worth it for a laboratory whose work varies; a fixed block is fine where the format is settled.
2. Ramp rate, and whether you need it. Faster ramping shortens runs substantially over many cycles, and it can change results for reactions sensitive to transition times. For routine end-point work the difference is time only; for anything being transferred between instruments, the ramp rate is part of the protocol.
3. Gradient capability for optimisation. A gradient block runs a range of annealing temperatures in one plate and turns a week of optimisation into one run. For a laboratory that develops assays it pays for itself quickly; for one that runs fixed validated protocols it is a feature that will not be used.
4. Uniformity across the block. The specification that matters is how much the temperature varies across the block, because a difference between wells appears as inconsistent amplification that looks like pipetting error. Ask for the uniformity figure and how it was measured, and verify it periodically.
5. Lid design and evaporation. A heated lid prevents condensation, and the pressure it applies has to suit the consumable. A lid that seals strips poorly loses volume over a long run, which concentrates the reaction and shifts results in a way that is hard to trace.

Verification and calibration

Block temperature drifts, and the instrument reports what its own sensor believes rather than what the reaction experiences. Periodic verification with an independent probe system is the only way to know, and it is a standard service for laboratories under an accredited scheme.

Keep the verification record with the instrument. A cycler that has never been checked is a plausible explanation for every unexplained result it has ever produced, which is an uncomfortable position after the fact.

Quantitative instruments are a different purchase

A real-time instrument adds optics, filters and analysis software, and the selection questions change entirely: channel count, dye compatibility, optical uniformity and the software's export behaviour. Do not evaluate one against an end-point cycler on price.

If the laboratory will eventually need quantitative work, buying a basic cycler now and a real-time instrument later is usually cheaper and better than buying a compromise that does neither well.

Common questions

What is the difference between a thermal cycler and a thermocycler?

Nothing. The two names describe the same instrument and suppliers use both, sometimes on the same page.

Do I need a gradient block?

If you develop or optimise assays, yes, because it collapses a week of annealing temperature trials into a single run. If you run fixed validated protocols only, it is a feature that will sit unused.

How important is ramp rate?

It shortens runs noticeably across many cycles and can affect reactions sensitive to transition times. If a protocol will move between instruments, treat the ramp rate as part of the protocol rather than a convenience.

Should a thermal cycler be calibrated?

Yes, periodically and with an independent probe, because the instrument reports its own sensor rather than the reaction temperature. Uniformity across the block matters as much as absolute accuracy.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices