When isocratic hplc beats a gradient: the separations a single hplc mobile phase composition handles better, why reversed phase hplc, reverse phase hplc and reverse hplc or hplc reverse phase are the same default for most analytes, and the equilibration and transfer advantages an isocratic method keeps

Choosing between isocratic and gradient

1. Look at the polarity spread of your analytes. A narrow spread separates well at one composition. A wide spread gives early compounds crowded at the front and late ones broad and retained for an age, which is exactly the problem a gradient exists to solve.
2. Count the whole cycle, where isocratic wins. An isocratic method needs no re-equilibration, so the cycle is the run. A gradient method's re-equilibration is frequently a third of the cycle and it is invisible in the chromatogram, which is why gradient methods are slower than they look.
3. Prefer isocratic where the method must transfer. Gradient methods carry the instrument's dwell volume into their retention times, so transferring one between instruments requires the dwell volume to be known and matched. An isocratic method has no such dependency, which makes it far more portable.
4. Start from reversed phase unless there is a reason not to. A non-polar bonded phase with an aqueous organic mobile phase retains by hydrophobicity and covers the large majority of small molecule work. Normal phase and other modes exist for specific problems, and reversed phase is where a method development starts.
5. Tune selectivity with the organic modifier and the pH. Switching between the common organic modifiers changes selectivity rather than just strength, and for ionisable compounds the mobile phase pH relative to the analyte's ionisation is the largest single lever available. Both are worth trying before changing column chemistry.

Column chemistry within reversed phase

The classic octadecyl phase is the starting point, and shorter chains, phenyl phases and polar embedded groups each shift selectivity in a different direction. For a difficult pair, a phase with a different retention mechanism is often more productive than another gradient.

Column quality varies in ways that matter for basic compounds: residual silanols cause tailing, and modern end-capped or hybrid particles are far better behaved. Where a base tails persistently, the column chemistry is the first suspect.

Mobile phase preparation and the baseline

An isocratic method is far more sensitive to mobile phase preparation, because any error persists through the whole run rather than being washed through by a gradient. Premix by mass where precision matters, or let the pump proportion and accept its error.

Baseline drift in an isocratic run is almost always temperature or a detector lamp rather than the mobile phase, which is the opposite of the usual gradient diagnosis.

System suitability on either mode

Retention, resolution of the critical pair, tailing factor and plate count at the start of every sequence, trended rather than only passed. That trend is what predicts a pump or column problem before it stops a run.

For a compendial method the suitability criteria are prescribed. For a developed method, set them from the method's own history rather than from a generic list, or they will either never fail or always fail.

Common questions

When should I use isocratic hplc?

When the analytes span a narrow polarity range. You get a shorter cycle with no re-equilibration, a flatter baseline and a method that transfers between instruments without matching dwell volumes.

Why is reversed phase hplc the default?

Because a non-polar bonded phase with an aqueous organic mobile phase retains by hydrophobicity, which suits the large majority of small molecules, and because the mobile phases are cheap, safe and compatible with mass spectrometric detection.

How do I change selectivity without changing column?

Switch the organic modifier, which alters selectivity rather than only strength, and adjust the mobile phase pH for ionisable compounds. Both are faster and cheaper than buying a different chemistry and frequently sufficient.

Can I convert a gradient method to isocratic?

Sometimes. Look at where the peaks elute on the gradient: if they all come off within a narrow composition window, that composition is a good isocratic starting point. If they span the gradient, they will not separate at one composition.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices