Automating the repetitive half of plate work: why a microplate dispenser fills a plate faster and more consistently than any pipette and where its dead volume and cassette cost decide whether it pays, what a plate sealer, a plate washer and a stacker each remove from a workflow and in what order they are usually worth buying, where laboratory automation companies sell a scheduler rather than a machine and what that layer actually does, how a liquid handling machine and used liquid handlers compare once drivers and support are counted, and what has to be measured about a manual workflow before any of it is automated

Automating in the order that pays

1. Measure the manual workflow first. Time each step and count the interruptions. The step that consumes the most hands on time is the one to automate, and it is frequently not the one people complain about.
2. Start with dispensing. Filling plates with a common reagent is the highest volume, lowest complexity step and the one a dispenser does better than a person. It is usually the cheapest real improvement available.
3. Cost dead volume and cassettes. A dispenser holds a minimum volume in its tubing that is lost every run, and cassettes are consumables with a life. For expensive reagents this can outweigh the time saved.
4. Add washing where the assay is wash sensitive. Plate washing is where immunoassay variability is created, and a well maintained washer removes operator differences. It is the second purchase for a plate based laboratory.
5. Buy a scheduler only once the devices exist. A scheduling layer coordinates instruments; it does not replace them. Buying it before the devices, or before drivers exist for them, produces a cell that cannot be assembled.
6. Confirm driver support for used equipment. Second hand liquid handlers are frequently good value mechanically and orphaned in software. Confirm a supported driver and a control computer that can still be maintained.

Automate the measured bottleneck

Laboratories automate the step that annoys them, which is frequently not the step that costs the most time. Half a day with a stopwatch redirects a large purchase.

It also produces the requirements document, because describing a workflow precisely is most of the specification.

Consistency is the real return

The value of plate automation is less throughput than removing operator to operator variation, which is what limits many assays. A dispenser that fills every well identically improves the data before it saves any time.

Measure that improvement explicitly with a uniformity plate before and after. It is the number that justifies the next purchase.

Common questions

What should be automated first?

Dispensing, in almost every plate based laboratory, because it is high volume and low complexity. Washing is second where the assay depends on it. Scheduling is last.

What is dead volume and why does it matter?

The reagent held in the tubing and manifold that cannot be dispensed and is lost each run. For a cheap buffer it is irrelevant; for an expensive reagent it can dominate the running cost.

Is used automation worth buying?

Mechanically often yes, and the risk is software: unsupported drivers, an obsolete control computer and no path to integration. Confirm both before buying.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices