Microplate dispenser and plate handling automation: automating the repetitive half

Automating in the order that pays

1. Measure the manual workflow first. Time each step and count the interruptions. The step that consumes the most hands on time is the one to automate, and it is frequently not the one people complain about.
2. Start with dispensing. Filling plates with a common reagent is the highest volume, lowest complexity step and the one a dispenser does better than a person. It is usually the cheapest real improvement available.
3. Cost dead volume and cassettes. A dispenser holds a minimum volume in its tubing that is lost every run, and cassettes are consumables with a life. For expensive reagents this can outweigh the time saved.
4. Add washing where the assay is wash sensitive. Plate washing is where immunoassay variability is created, and a well maintained washer removes operator differences. It is the second purchase for a plate based laboratory.
5. Buy a scheduler only once the devices exist. A scheduling layer coordinates instruments; it does not replace them. Buying it before the devices, or before drivers exist for them, produces a cell that cannot be assembled.
6. Confirm driver support for used equipment. Second hand liquid handlers are frequently good value mechanically and orphaned in software. Confirm a supported driver and a control computer that can still be maintained.

Automate the measured bottleneck

Laboratories automate the step that annoys them, which is frequently not the step that costs the most time. Half a day with a stopwatch redirects a large purchase.

It also produces the requirements document, because describing a workflow precisely is most of the specification.

Consistency is the real return

The value of plate automation is less throughput than removing operator to operator variation, which is what limits many assays. A dispenser that fills every well identically improves the data before it saves any time.

Measure that improvement explicitly with a uniformity plate before and after. It is the number that justifies the next purchase.

A microplate shaker, and what the orbit decides

A microplate shaker is specified by orbit and speed together, because the two decide whether liquid mixes or climbs out. A small orbit of one to three millimetres at high speed mixes small volumes in a 96 or 384 well plate without splashing, which is what a wash or an incubation step needs; a larger orbit at lower speed suits deep well blocks and culture. Check the plate clamping, whether the unit is rated for an incubator's humidity, and whether it can be driven by the same software as the dispenser if the two sit in one workflow.

A microplate 96 well format, and what varies inside it

The 96 well footprint is standardised and almost nothing else about the plate is. Well shape decides mixing and how much volume can be recovered, flat for reading, round and V-bottom for recovery. Surface decides whether cells attach, whether protein binds and whether a compound adsorbs, which is why a binding assay and a culture use different plates that look identical. Colour decides optics: clear for absorbance, black to stop crosstalk in fluorescence, white for luminescence. Working volume and whether the plate is sterile and certified low-binding complete the specification.

A microplate incubator shaker, and matching it to the assay

A shaking plate incubator has to hold temperature and move liquid without spilling it, and the specification that decides both is the orbit against the speed. A small orbit at high speed mixes small volumes in a 96 or 384 well plate; a larger orbit at low speed suits deep well blocks and shallow cultures. Then the clamping, since a plate that walks across the platform is a ruined run, and whether it stacks. For cell work the gas and humidity control matters more than the shaking, and the two are rarely combined well in one box.

Common questions

What should be automated first, and where do laboratory automation companies fit?

Dispensing, in almost every plate based laboratory, because it is high volume and low complexity. Washing is second where the assay depends on it. Scheduling is last.

What is dead volume and why does it matter?

The reagent held in the tubing and manifold that cannot be dispensed and is lost each run. For a cheap buffer it is irrelevant; for an expensive reagent it can dominate the running cost.

Is used automation worth buying?

Mechanically often yes, and the risk is software: unsupported drivers, an obsolete control computer and no path to integration. Confirm both before buying.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices