Sample management software and sample management systems: what laboratory sample management software, lab sample management software, sample tracking software and a lab sample tracking software package each have to do before a sample can be found

What the system must do

1. Model the storage as it really is. Freezer, shelf, rack, box, position, and the same again for ambient and refrigerated storage, across buildings. The hierarchy must match the physical estate, because a model the laboratory has to translate in its head is a model people stop updating.
2. Barcodes and scanning that survive the freezer. Labels have to stay legible after cold storage and handling, and scanning has to work at the freezer door where the work happens. This is a consumable and hardware decision as much as a software one, and it is where implementations most often fail in practice.
3. Capacity, occupancy and finding space. Good systems tell you what is full, what is nearly full and where a new box can go. Laboratories run out of freezer space suddenly and expensively, and a system that surfaces occupancy early is worth real money.
4. Chain of custody and audit trail. Every movement, aliquot, thaw and disposal recorded against a person and a time. Where results support a regulated submission, the electronic record and signature obligations apply to this system as much as to any other.
5. The boundary with the system of record. Decide explicitly what sample management owns, which is location and custody, and what the laboratory information system owns, which is tests, results and release. Two systems that both claim to hold sample status will disagree, and reconciling them becomes somebody's permanent job.

Retention, disposal and the cost of keeping everything

A sample inventory that only grows is a freezer estate that only grows, and the electricity, the space and the failure risk grow with it. The system should support a retention policy with review dates and a disposal workflow that is recorded rather than improvised.

Ask how the system handles consent withdrawal or a required destruction, because human samples sometimes carry that obligation and satisfying it has to be demonstrable.

Implementation, not licensing, is the project

The work is labelling and registering what is already in the freezers, and it is substantial. Plan it, resource it, and decide honestly whether historic material is registered fully, minimally or not at all, because a half-registered inventory is worse than a documented boundary.

Start with new material and one freezer done properly rather than everything done partially. A system people trust for part of the estate spreads; one nobody trusts anywhere does not.

Common questions

What does sample management software do?

It records where every sample is, how it got there, what was taken from it and when it was disposed of, with an audit trail. Location and custody are its job.

Is it the same as a LIMS?

No. A LIMS owns tests, results, methods and release; sample management owns location and custody. Some LIMS include sample management, and where both exist the boundary must be decided explicitly.

What is the hardest part of implementation?

Registering what is already in the freezers, with labels that survive cold storage and scanning that works at the freezer door. Licensing is the small part of the project.

Does it need an audit trail?

Yes, and where results support a regulated submission the electronic records and signatures obligations apply to it as to any other system holding that data.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices