Jurkat cell line care and cell line authentication
The most used cell lines in biology are also the most misidentified and the most quietly contaminated. Suspension lines punished by overgrowth, transfection hosts drifting under continuous selection, and lines swapped years ago in another laboratory all produce data that looks fine. Authentication and screening are what make a line's results mean anything.
- the biosafety manual that decides containment for cultured lines
- BMBL
- the ICH guideline on characterisation of cell substrates
- Q5D
- good laboratory practice for nonclinical studies, 21 CFR
- Part 58
The figures in this panel are regulation, guideline and manual identifiers, named from the documents themselves and linked below. They are not prices: BioBricks publishes verified prices for synthesis services only, and does not imply a service price index it has not measured.
- 4 vendor service pages verifiedevery figure matched verbatim to the vendor's page
- Quoted and dated, never estimatedlast verification pass 2026-08-24
- 1 service classes coveredeach with measured search demand behind it
Running a line properly, and working with jurkat cells in suspension
- Control density rather than schedule. Suspension lines have a working density range, and cultures allowed to overgrow change phenotype and respond differently for several passages afterwards. Count and split by density rather than by day of the week.
- Authenticate identity on arrival and periodically. Short tandem repeat profiling against a reference database is inexpensive and definitive. Run it when a line arrives, before a major study and when anything about the line's behaviour surprises you.
- Screen for mycoplasma on a schedule. Contamination is common, invisible and changes cell behaviour substantially. Test new arrivals in quarantine and cultures in continuous use on a fixed interval, and keep the results with the line record.
- Set and enforce a passage limit. Lines change with passage number, and a study running across a wide passage range has an uncontrolled variable in it. Bank early, work from the bank, and return to it rather than culturing indefinitely.
- Bank properly and split the storage. A frozen bank from a low passage authenticated culture, split across separate storage locations, is what lets a laboratory recover from a contamination or a freezer failure without losing years of work.
- Record the line's provenance. Where it came from, when, its authentication result, its passage at receipt and its screening history. A line with no provenance is a line whose results cannot be defended.
Misidentification is common and old, which is why str analysis and STR profiling exist
A substantial number of lines in circulation are not what their labels say, and many of those substitutions happened decades ago and propagated through sharing between laboratories. Morphology does not detect it and neither does behaviour.
Profiling is the only test that does, and it is cheap. A laboratory that profiles every line once has removed a category of error that otherwise sits under everything it publishes.
Quarantine is the cheapest control
New arrivals handled in a separate incubator, with separate media and a screening test before they join the main culture area, prevent the events that cost laboratories months. It requires space and discipline rather than money.
Write it into the laboratory's procedures with a named owner. Quarantine that depends on whoever remembers is quarantine that will be skipped when a project is urgent.
Where a549 cells and other adherent lines differ in handling
A suspension line is passaged by dilution and an adherent line by detachment, and almost every practical difference follows from that. The adherent culture meets an enzyme at every passage, which trims surface proteins and is why a marker reads lower straight after splitting; the suspension culture never does, but it is counted with clumps in it and clumps are the usual reason a count and a growth rate disagree.
The other difference is what a confluent culture means. An adherent monolayer signals its own limit visibly and a suspension does not, so a suspension left one day too long has already changed its metabolic state by the time anybody notices. Keep the density band written down rather than judged by eye.
raw 264.7 cells, also listed as raw cells
raw 264.7 cells appear in catalogues as raw cells too, two spellings of one mouse macrophage line, and the split is worth knowing only because it divides a search. The line is transformed and adherent, responds to bacterial ligands, and is not a substitute for a primary macrophage where the receptor repertoire matters.
A raw264.7 cell line and what it is used for
A raw264.7 cell line is the usual first pass for an innate immune readout, because it is cheap to grow, easy to stimulate and gives a large cytokine response, which makes it a screening tool rather than a model. A hit is repeated in bone marrow derived cells before it is believed.
Common questions
- How often should cell lines be authenticated?
- On receipt, before publication or a major study, and at least annually for lines in continuous culture. Funders and journals increasingly ask for the evidence, and generating it retrospectively is not possible.
- Why do transfection host lines drift?
- Continuous passage and selection favour subpopulations, and transfection efficiency is one of the properties that changes. Working from a low passage bank rather than a long running culture keeps the behaviour stable.
- Is a mycoplasma detection kit really necessary if cultures look fine?
- Yes, because contamination is invisible without testing and alters proliferation, gene expression and drug response. Testing only when something looks wrong means the affected experiments have already been done.
- What passage range should be used?
- A range narrow enough that behaviour is stable, established for each line rather than assumed. Recording passage number with every experiment is the minimum, and returning to the bank rather than extending a culture is the discipline.
Get a shortlist for your project
Browse by service class
Sources
Cite or embed this figure
The median advertised gene synthesis price per base pair in the US research synthesis services market was $0.11 in August 2026, across 4 verified vendor service pages recorded in BioBricks Synthesis Price Index.
Cite as: "BioBricks Synthesis Price Index", updated 2026-08-24, https://biobricks.org/jurkat-cell-line/.