Ultra high performance liquid chromatography system selection: pressure, dispersion and data rate

Specifying liquid chromatography systems

1. Start with the pressure the column needs, then add margin. Sub-two-micron particles at useful flow rates generate back pressures that older systems cannot reach. Specify the pressure at the flow rate and viscosity you will actually run, not the headline maximum, and leave room for a column ageing over its life.
2. Count the extra-column volume, every connection. The gain from a narrow, efficient column is lost in tubing, fittings, the injector and the detector cell. Short lengths of narrow bore tubing, zero dead volume fittings and a small detector cell are not refinements, they are the difference between a working system and an expensive one.
3. Check the detector acquisition rate against the peak width. A peak a second or two wide needs enough data points across it to be integrated reliably. A detector sampling too slowly reports a smaller, broader peak and nobody can tell from the chromatogram that the instrument caused it.
4. Plan the injector and the carryover specification. Small volumes and high sensitivity make carryover visible. Ask for a measured carryover figure on a compound like yours, with the wash configuration that produced it, rather than a specification measured on something convenient.
5. Decide whether micro hplc suits the sample better. Where sample is scarce or sensitivity per mass injected matters more than speed, narrow columns at low flow give more signal from less material. It is a different trade from raw speed, and for precious samples usually the better one.

Solvent, filtration and the cost of a blocked frit

Narrow columns have fine frits and block readily. Filtered solvents, filtered samples and an inline filter are cheap; a column killed in a fortnight is not, and a laboratory that skips filtration pays for it in consumables within a year.

Degassing matters more at high pressure because a bubble that a wider system tolerates will disturb a narrow one. An inline degasser is standard for a reason.

Method transfer in a regulated setting

Compendial chapters set out how far a method may be adjusted before the change counts as a modification. Scaling a method onto smaller particles usually stays within those bounds if the adjustments are made together and documented, and usually does not if the gradient is redesigned along the way.

Record the scaling calculation with the method. The commonest audit finding here is a method that clearly changed with no arithmetic on file explaining why it is still the same method.

What to make a UHPLC chromatography vendor demonstrate

Run your own hardest separation on the demonstration system, with your own sample preparation, and look at the peak width of the earliest eluting compound. Early peaks are where dispersion shows up first and where specification sheets are least informative.

Ask for the system to be plumbed as it would be delivered. A demonstration instrument with the shortest possible capillaries and no autosampler in line is not the system you are buying.

In ultra performance liquid chromatography, the pressure is a consequence, not the point

Smaller particles give better efficiency and cost pressure, so the higher pressure limit is what makes the chemistry usable rather than a benefit in itself. The gains are faster separations at equal resolution, or better resolution in the same time.

Realising them needs the whole system: low dispersion tubing, a small detector cell, a fast data rate and an injector that does not broaden the peak. A high pressure pump plumbed into a conventional system delivers a fraction of the benefit and a great deal of frustration.

UHPLC vs HPLC: transferring methods in either direction

Moving a method to a smaller particle system is arithmetic plus dwell volume, and moving one back is the same in reverse. What does not transfer automatically is a separation that depended on the older column's selectivity, since the smaller particle column may use a different chemistry.

Where methods must run on both, verify the separation on each rather than relying on the calculation, and keep the dwell volumes documented. Regulated methods need the transfer evidenced either way.

Nano HPLC and very low flow: what it is for

At the other end of the scale, capillary and nano flow systems trade robustness for sensitivity with limited sample, which is why they are standard in proteomics and rare elsewhere. Every connection matters, dead volume dominates, and blockages are frequent.

They are specialist instruments needing a dedicated operator. For a laboratory whose samples are not scarce, the sensitivity is better bought in the detector than in the flow scale.

Common questions

What is the difference between HPLC chromatography and an ultra high performance liquid chromatography system?

Particle size and everything that follows from it. Sub-two-micron packing gives sharper peaks, needs much higher pressure, and needs a flow path with very little dispersion or the sharpness never reaches the detector.

Can I transfer an existing HPLC method to a UHPLC system?

Usually yes, by scaling the column dimensions, flow rate, injection volume and gradient together. Where the method is a registered one, the scaling has to stay within the allowed adjustment ranges or it is a change requiring revalidation.

Why did my peaks get worse after the upgrade?

Extra-column dispersion, almost always. Long or wide tubing between injector, column and detector, or a large detector flow cell, will broaden narrow peaks regardless of how good the column is.

Is micro hplc the same thing?

No. Micro scale reduces column diameter and flow rate to get more sensitivity from limited sample. Ultra high performance reduces particle size to get resolution and speed. They can be combined, and they answer different problems.

Do I need a high pressure chromatography pump?

Only if throughput or resolution is the constraint and the whole system can be low dispersion. A high pressure pump in a conventional stack delivers a fraction of the benefit, because tubing, cell volume and data rate then limit the result.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices