Lab equipment calibration as a programme: deciding what needs calibration of lab equipment, at what interval, where scale calibration services and load cell calibration services fit, and what a certificate must show

Building the programme

1. Decide what is calibrated and what is verified. Instruments whose reading forms part of a result need calibration; instruments used qualitatively need a functional check. Calibrating everything wastes money, and calibrating nothing means results nobody can defend. Write the list and the reason against each entry.
2. Set intervals from use and consequence. An instrument used constantly for a result somebody relies on earns a shorter interval than one used occasionally as an indicator. A uniform annual interval across a laboratory is a purchasing convenience rather than a technical decision, and it is both wasteful and risky at the two ends.
3. Put internal checks between external visits. A daily check weight on a balance, a reference thermometer in an incubator, a quick gravimetric check on a pipette: these cost minutes and catch drift long before the annual service would. They are what make a long external interval defensible.
4. Require certificates that report numbers. As-found and as-left values, the acceptance limits applied and where they came from, the ambient conditions and the reference used. A certificate reporting only a pass has withheld the information that lets you see an instrument drifting.
5. Decide where accreditation is required. Accredited calibration carries third party assessment of the provider's competence and traceability, and regulated or accredited laboratories generally need it. A research laboratory often does not, and can buy competent unaccredited service far more cheaply where the certificate still reports real numbers.

What an out-of-tolerance result actually means

When an instrument is found out of tolerance, the question is not only what it costs to adjust but what work it affected since the last check. A programme should say in advance how that impact assessment is done and who decides whether results are withdrawn.

This is the main practical argument for as-found reporting and for short internal checks: both bound the period of doubt, and a bounded period is a manageable problem rather than a year of uncertainty.

Records, labels and the register

Every instrument carries its status where a user can see it, and the register records what was done, when, by whom and against what reference. That register is the first thing an assessor asks for and the last thing a laboratory can reconstruct.

Include the reference equipment itself. Check weights, reference thermometers and standards drift too and carry their own intervals.

Common questions

What laboratory equipment needs calibration?

Anything whose reading forms part of a result. Instruments used qualitatively need a functional check instead. Write the list with a reason against each entry rather than calibrating everything or nothing.

How often should equipment be calibrated?

At an interval set by how heavily it is used and what depends on the result, with cheap internal checks between external visits. A uniform annual interval is a purchasing convenience, not a technical decision.

What should a calibration certificate show?

As-found and as-left values, the acceptance limits and their source, the ambient conditions and the reference used. A pass or fail statement alone hides the drift you are paying to detect.

Do I need accredited calibration?

Regulated and accredited laboratories generally do. Research laboratories often do not and can buy competent unaccredited service more cheaply, provided the certificate still reports measured numbers.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices