Reagents where the antibody is the analyte: why a centromere antibody, an anti centromere antibody and a crest antibody name a patient autoantibody rather than a reagent you buy antibodies as, what a jo1 antibody, gad antibodies, a 21 hydroxylase antibody, a tshr antibody and an nt5c1a antibody are measured for and why a pattern on a substrate is the classical readout, how a c4d antibody, a c3d antibody, an anti c3 antibody and a c5b-9 antibody detect deposited complement fragments in tissue rather than circulating protein, where a cenpa antibody, a numa antibody, a pericentrin antibody, a coilin antibody, a fibrillarin antibody, an sp100 antibody, a nup98 antibody and an rna polymerase iii antibody are laboratory reagents against the same structures the autoantibodies happen to recognise, and why the two uses must never be described in the same sentence without saying which is meant

A catalogue listing can mean two entirely different things here: a reagent you buy to detect a protein, or a patient antibody that is itself the thing being measured. The same structural target appears in both roles, and the distinction decides the assay, the controls and what may be claimed from a result.

the labelling clause behind research use only on a reagent
809.10(c)
the clinical laboratory improvement amendments, 42 CFR
Part 493
good laboratory practice for nonclinical studies, 21 CFR
Part 58

The figures in this panel are regulation and manual identifiers, named from the documents themselves and linked below. They are not prices: BioBricks publishes verified prices for synthesis services only, and does not imply a reagent price index it has not measured.

Keeping the two uses apart

  1. State whether the antibody is reagent or analyte. A reagent detects a target; an autoantibody is the target. Assays, controls and regulatory expectations differ completely, and the same protein name appears in both contexts.
  2. Read pattern before titre in autoantibody work. Classical autoantibody testing on a cell substrate reports a staining pattern that suggests a family of specificities, followed by a confirmatory specific assay. The pattern is the screen, not the answer.
  3. Detect complement deposition in tissue, not plasma. Deposited fragments in tissue are the informative finding in transplant and immune complex disease. Measuring circulating complement answers a different question about consumption and synthesis.
  4. Choose structural reagents for the compartment. Nuclear body, nucleolar, centromere and nuclear pore reagents each give a characteristic pattern that is itself a control. A stain that does not look like the expected structure is a warning.
  5. Respect the labelling boundary. Reagents sold for research use may not be used to produce a result that informs clinical care, however capable they are. Where the result will inform care, the assay has to be appropriate to that use.

Same target, two roles

Nuclear and centromeric structures are studied with laboratory reagents and are also the targets of patient autoantibodies, which is not a coincidence: they became known as autoantigens because patient sera stained them.

The overlap makes catalogue searching confusing and the distinction consequential. Say which role you mean, every time.

Patterns are a quality control

Reagents against subnuclear structures produce characteristic, recognisable patterns. That is an unusually good built in control: if the stain does not look like the structure, something is wrong with the reagent or the protocol.

Photograph the expected pattern once on a control sample and keep it with the reagent record.

Common questions

Is a listing for an autoantibody a reagent I can buy?
Sometimes both exist under the same name: a laboratory reagent against the structure, and an assay that measures a patient's antibodies against it. Read the product description carefully, because the two are not interchangeable.
What does a staining pattern tell you?
It narrows the likely specificity to a family and directs which confirmatory assay to run. It is a screening result, and reporting it as a specific diagnosis is not supported.
Why measure deposited complement rather than circulating?
Because deposition in tissue localises the process, which is what matters in transplant rejection and immune complex disease. Circulating levels report consumption and synthesis, which is a different question.

Get a shortlist for your project

Free. We send a shortlist of vendors whose published prices and service scope fit what you described, built from the verified index on this site. We may email you about this enquiry and similar services from this site; opt out any time, including from the first message.

Browse by service class

Sources

Cite or embed this figure

The median advertised gene synthesis price per base pair in the US research synthesis services market was $0.11 in August 2026, across 4 verified vendor service pages recorded in BioBricks Synthesis Price Index.

Cite as: "BioBricks Synthesis Price Index", updated 2026-08-24, https://biobricks.org/centromere-antibody/.

Embed this figure (plain HTML, no scripts)
median advertised gene synthesis price per base pair · the US research synthesis services market · August 2026

$0.11

Middle 50%$0.07 – $0.15
verified vendor service pages4

Source: BioBricks Synthesis Price Index

Get a vendor shortlistCompare synthesis prices