Automated sample storage: when an automated store earns its price, what it does to sample quality, and the failure planning it demands

Making the case and planning the install

1. Count retrievals, not samples. A large archive that is rarely touched is well served by manual freezers and good records. A smaller collection accessed constantly is where automation pays, because the value is in picking speed and in avoiding the excursions that repeated manual searching causes.
2. Excursion protection is the quality argument. Every manual pick warms the whole box while somebody reads labels. An automated store picks individual tubes at temperature, which for long-term collections is a genuine sample quality benefit rather than a convenience.
3. Tube format is a long commitment. Stores work with specific tube and rack formats, usually barcoded on the base. Converting an existing collection is a substantial project in itself and must be costed as part of the purchase rather than assumed.
4. Facilities, power and heat. These are large machines with power, floor loading, heat rejection and access requirements, and they need to be sited with the building rather than placed in a laboratory. Involve the facilities team before the specification is fixed.
5. Plan for failure before it happens. Decide what happens on a mechanical failure, a refrigeration failure and a power failure: how samples are recovered manually, how long the store holds temperature, what backup power exists and who is called. A store holding irreplaceable material without a written failure plan is a risk nobody has accepted deliberately.

The database is the other half

An automated store is only as useful as the record of what is in it, and that record has to be reconciled with the laboratory's sample management system rather than existing separately. Two inventories of the same tubes will diverge.

Ask how the store's inventory is exported and reconciled, and how a discrepancy is investigated. This is a routine operational question that is rarely asked during evaluation.

Alternatives worth considering first

Better labelling, base-barcoded tubes, a proper location model and a handheld scanner solve a large share of the problems that prompt an automated store enquiry, at a fraction of the cost. Try them before committing capital.

Where the driver is capacity rather than retrieval, additional conventional freezers with an alarm and a failure plan are usually the cheaper answer.

Common questions

When is automated sample storage worth buying?

When retrieval frequency is high and the collection is valuable enough that temperature excursions during manual picking matter. A large but rarely accessed archive is usually better served by conventional freezers and good records.

What happens if the store fails?

That must be decided and written down before purchase: how samples are recovered manually, how long temperature holds, what backup power exists and who is called. Ask vendors for the manual recovery procedure specifically.

Can I use my existing tubes?

Usually not without conversion. Stores work with specific tube and rack formats, normally base-barcoded, and converting an existing collection is a substantial project that must be costed with the purchase.

What should I try first?

Base-barcoded tubes, a proper location model, a handheld scanner and disciplined records solve many of the problems that prompt an automated store enquiry, for a small fraction of the cost.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices