Compound microscopes: what a compound microscope, a light compound microscope and other upright microscopes do that a stereo instrument cannot, what the microscope stage and a mechanical stage microscope arrangement buy, and the checks that separate two similar-looking instruments

The checks that matter

1. Objective correction and numerical aperture. Numerical aperture rather than magnification sets what the instrument can resolve, and the correction class sets how flat and colour-true the field is. A quotation that lists magnifications without numerical apertures and correction classes is withholding the specification that decides image quality.
2. The condenser is half the optical path. An adjustable condenser with an iris, properly set up, is what produces contrast and resolution in transmitted light. Instruments sold with a fixed condenser are cheaper and cannot be aligned properly, and no objective compensates for that.
3. Illumination quality and stability. Even, adjustable illumination with a stable colour temperature matters for imaging and for hours of comfortable viewing. Light emitting diode sources are now standard and vary considerably in evenness and in whether intensity changes shift colour.
4. Head, eyepieces and field number. A binocular or trinocular head with adjustable interpupillary distance and dioptre correction is worth specifying, and the eyepiece field number determines how much of the image you actually see. A large field number with mediocre objectives shows more of a poorer image.
5. Mechanical quality. Stage movement, focus feel and absence of drift are what make an instrument pleasant over years, and they are the things a brief demonstration reveals immediately. Ask to operate it rather than to watch it operated.

Compound against stereo

A compound instrument gives high magnification of thin, transmitted-light specimens and a very shallow depth of field. A stereo or dissecting instrument gives low magnification, a large working distance and a three-dimensional view of solid objects. They answer different questions and a laboratory doing both needs both.

Buying a compound instrument for dissection work is the most common mismatch, and it is obvious within a day of delivery.

Imaging, if you will do it

A trinocular head and a camera port are far easier to specify at purchase than to add later, and the camera should be matched to the objective's resolution rather than chosen for pixel count. An oversized sensor behind a modest objective records empty magnification.

Decide whether images are for documentation or measurement. Measurement needs a calibration slide and a recorded scale for each objective, which is a small discipline that makes the images usable later.

Common questions

What is a compound microscope?

An instrument that magnifies in two stages, objective and eyepiece, to view thin specimens at high magnification, usually in transmitted light. It is the standard laboratory microscope for slides and sections.

What magnification do I need?

Ask about numerical aperture instead. Resolution is set by numerical aperture, and magnification beyond what it supports enlarges the image without revealing more detail.

What is the difference between a compound and a stereo microscope?

A compound instrument gives high magnification of thin transmitted-light specimens with shallow depth of field; a stereo instrument gives low magnification, long working distance and a three-dimensional view of solid objects.

Does the condenser matter?

A great deal. An adjustable condenser with an iris, correctly set up, produces the contrast and resolution the objectives are capable of. A fixed condenser cannot be aligned and limits the whole instrument.

Browse by service class

• Compare Gene synthesis on advertised prices